-
You are currently browsing the Praexis Business Labs blog archives for October, 2008.
Archives
[i] that the then on-going collapse of Asian markets was predictable a year in advance. You could see it clearly in various financial measures and statistics, he wrote, all of them widely available. In spite of this, most large companies were caught completely unawares.
What this business giant wrote wasn’t news to me. It was confirmation so I shouted with delight. I had 30 years in the trenches of workouts and turnarounds. I knew most were avoidable. To me Drucker confirmed:
That uneasiness of economic prediction, which depends on outside the firm data, is better than the relative certainty of decisions based on accepted opinion, memory and business experience. Know the times; get timing right.
“Yeah, but everybody knows you can’t time.”
“You mean we don’t take time.”
“The big guys missed it.”
“Then you feel better because you have company?”
“Well they can afford it. I can’t, don’t have time, don’t understand. It’s economics, statistics. You can get whatever answer you want. It’s speculation. I won’t do it anyway. How would I explain it? It will reduce profits. I got real problems to deal with ….”
“But?”
“What?”
“What are you going to do?”
Economic prediction isn’t a theoretical exercise by which management draws out a universal on the whole economy. Economic prediction is specific to a single company, to look at those things outside the firm capable of upsetting or accelerating its future results. The objective and the outcome is to make things a little easier and happen faster with better results.
[i] “Peter F. Drucker, “The Next Information Revolution.” Forbes ASAP, 24 Aug (1998), p. 47
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

